Which approach best describes how a recall drill should be conducted?

• A. A real product recall from the market
• B. Training only the recall team without testing
• C. A simulated recall using a fictitious lot number to test tracing, notification procedures, communications, and disposal or segregation of recalled items
• D. No testing of the recall process

Answer: (C)

A recall drill should be a safe, real-world practice of the entire recall process, from identifying the issue to notifying stakeholders, tracing affected products, and disposing or segregating recalled items. A simulated recall using a fictitious lot number is the best approach because it lets the team exercise end-to-end procedures without risking real products or causing unnecessary disruption. It tests whether tracing systems, records, and communications work smoothly across functions and whether roles and timelines are clear, so gaps can be fixed before a real event. This type of drill reveals weaknesses in data accuracy, coordination, and decision-making, helping ensure rapid, compliant action if a real recall occurs. Real recalls in the market would be dangerous and disruptive and aren’t appropriate for drills. Training only the recall team without testing misses cross-functional coordination, and not testing at all leaves the organization unprepared.